Re: Blind vs. mainstream distros

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



According to eric oyen:
# In fact, the sense I get is that we (the blind) aren't really even considered human. As long as we continue to consider ourselves to be "the blind" rather than people who happen to be blind or visually impaired, we will continue to be viewed as less than human. I am human. Blindness is a physical characteristic that I happen to possess. My image of myself is human first and foremost, with blindness as a challenge to overcome in whatever way is humanly possible. In projecting this image of myself to the general public, I generally feel less dehumanized than your run-of-the-mill "the blind," because in projecting my self image of human first, I relate to other humans on a human level, and the rest can more easily take care of itself. No, this isn't a matter of political correctness or anything even remotely close. It's a matter of self image and psychology. There is a certain stigma, write or not, attached to "the blind" by the general public at large. Overcoming it is possible, but it means educating the general public, as well as other people challenged by blindness or visual impairment, that our blindness or visual impairment is a physical characteristic, and even a limitation in many cases, but that it is not at all who or what we are as people.
~Kyle

_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Speakup]     [Fedora]     [Linux Kernel]     [Yosemite News]     [Big List of Linux Books]