Can you loose the -ng fork and try a build with generic espeak and
verify identical alsa issues with the non-fork version of espeak? That
would for sure point at defective alsa code.
On Mon, 11 Jul 2016, Chris Brannon wrote:
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 03:31:13
From: Chris Brannon <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx>,
Mark Peveto <southernprince73@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: for those who want console speech in manjaro based distros
Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
pulseaudio is responsible for blocking signals that rightfully alsa
ought to get.
Yes, but I also built espeak-ng's audio library without pulseaudio
support, with the same result.
So at this point, I'm going on the assumption that there are issues with
the ALSA code as well.
-- Chris
_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
--
_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list