Re: a *very* odd question especially for me.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Each port on that modem/router probably has a single digit number on it.
That single digit is the fourth in an ip address that's ip4. The ip6 protocol is different. I know of two prefixes that have three digits separated by periods. One of them starts out with 192.168.x.y and the other starts with 10.x.y.z. Your modem/router will probably use the first 192.168.x.yip4 numbering system to communicate. The x in that 192.168.x.y is usually the same number for all local connections on a router too. A hint, power cords usually plug into the bottom of routers; next in my case an external modem cord connects moving upward. After that, computers connect. Numbers for computers usually start at zero and go up to 3 if you can connect four devices to a modem/router. I hope I haven't confused you any further.

On Thu, 23 Jul 2015, Karen Lewellen wrote:

Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:52:27
From: Karen Lewellen <klewellen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: a *very* odd question especially for me.

which is exactly what I said I was doing. I indicated that my modem/rooter allows for multiple connections.


On Thu, 23 Jul 2015, Jude DaShiell wrote:

If you're going from one of your computers to another of your computers to get the work done that ought to be easier since all you connect to will be local.

On Thu, 23 Jul 2015, Karen Lewellen wrote:

 Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 12:41:20
 From: Karen Lewellen <klewellen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 Reply-To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
 To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
 Subject: Re: a *very* odd question especially for me.

 Hi Jude,
 I am not sure what you mean by a remote provider.
 Given I have an entire production studio, recording the material should
 not be an issue.  also, it is my understanding that the various Linux
 programs for  music work can recognize a device connected to the sound
 card,  i. e. a midi cable running from a keyboard to the midi port on the
 card itself. The card is not doing the recording, it is providing the
 playback through  the speakers.  the software  with the ability to
 recognize a four duplex card is managing the recording.
All this is done on a computer sitting in my office, assuming a real Linux
 installation can be done with these goals in mind.
 All this of course assumes I am even on the same page as your idea.
 Thanks,
 Kare


 On Thu, 23 Jul 2015, Jude DaShiell wrote:

> The remote machine would have to record to disk its sound card output > for you, then you would need to download those files in order to listen > to them. Assuming your remote provider is able and willing to provide > you those extra services. They'll have to have a high quality sound > card installed and you'll have to pre-arrange with them when to start > the recording from the sound card and some means to let them know to end > the recording and sync their disks so you'll get a full copy of what you > recorded.
> >  On Thu, 23 Jul 2015, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> > >   Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:24:29
> >   From: Karen Lewellen <klewellen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reply-To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >   To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >   Subject: a *very* odd question especially for me.
> > > >   ...but what else is knew? laughs.
> >   How scriptable is Linux?
> > Before the major players start on a roll, let me explain using the > > only
> >   functional way I can with the only operating system I use.
> >   *I do not have a fully functioning Linux box at all.*  I believe we
> >   established this a while back.
> > However there is a *single* task I may be willing to dedicate > > hardware
> >   to, if this can be done.
> > I have absolutely zero interest in any full fledged aspect. if I > > cannot > > do this one thing the os has little appeal for me. after a good 7 > > years > > or so trying to get Linux going and not finding anyone local with > > the
> >   skill I respect others appreciation but I am not having this sort of
> >   experience.
> >   In the DOS operating system one could create .bat files that managed
> >   several tasks with a single file.
> >   the autoexec.bat file is a good example.
> >   You can create them with a text editor, no major complex commands
> >   required.
> > If Linux has this ability, and I would be surprised if it did not, > > here > > is
> >   the situation.
> > I am a professional singer. When I perform I use real musicians, not > > their electronic equals which means I require arrangements for them > > to
> >   play.
> > I am writing a grand deal of material these days, and if I am going > > to > > get
> >   that material recorded  I must do the following.
> > 1 get the parts out of my head and into sheet music form, most likely
> >   using a well outfitted keyboard instrument's for part of the job.
> > 2 confirm via playback that what I have done will sound when played > > as
> >   desired.
> >   and 3. get the material printed, or into printable form.
> > > >   Now, I know there are allot of  command line programs in Linux
> >   distributions that can  accomplish my goals.
> > The problem for me is getting the Linux side of the computing > > functional, > > or at the very least, a way for me to ssh telnet into a box using my > > dos
> >   setup to run the programs themselves.
> >   Yes there is a question here!
> >   assuming I could get the computer hardware with the kind of quality
> > soundcard to Handel the multiple-track playback, is it possible to do > > the
> >   following.
> > 1, is Linux distribution is installed correctly in the first place, > > ssh
> >   telnet  into that machine from my main one and
> > 2, using scripting , assuming this can be done simply, create a set > > of > > .bat file equivalents to run the various programs I need from the > > command
> >   line?
> > > > The other major hardware involved is no hardship. I have a > > combination > > modem/rooter which works with both wireless and wired devices and > > multiple
> >   ports for the wired connection.
> > I share that because I know even if I am not running anything > > directly > > from the Linux computer itself, it does need an Ethernet connection > > of > > some kind generating some kind of ip for me to use for the ssh > > -telnet. > > again the idea is to do well basically what I do here for shellworld, > > and
> >   with other services.
> > treat this box like a shell, ssh TELNET into it, run the scripts > > for > > the > > music programs I desire, and leave. The box will not even need > > speech as
> >   I plan to use it.
> >   Possible at all?
> >   Karen
> > > >   _______________________________________________
> >   Blinux-list mailing list
> >   Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> >   https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
> > > >  -- > >  _______________________________________________
>  Blinux-list mailing list
>  Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>  https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
> >
 _______________________________________________
 Blinux-list mailing list
 Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list


--

_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list




_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list


--

_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Speakup]     [Fedora]     [Linux Kernel]     [Yosemite News]     [Big List of Linux Books]