Greetings Jude and all,
I posted a question about this to the debian development list because
Jude's information conflicts with what my web hosting company shared a
month ago.
Work on Alpine continues, although it has shifted from the University of
Washington to a new source forge structure. See below.
Karen
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 17:15:57 +0100
From: Brian <ad44@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: debian-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: alpine status?
Resent-Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 16:16:31 +0000 (UTC)
Resent-From: debian-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu 04 Sep 2014 at 11:06:14 -0400, Karen Lewellen wrote:
Can anyone confirm if development continues on alpine?
I am getting mixed messages about this, one from my web hosting
company suggesting I join the developer's list, and another from an
end user claiming that development no longer exists.
According to
http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main/a/alpine/alpine_2.11+dfsg1-2_copyright
Debian gets alpine from
http://sourceforge.net/projects/re-alpine
Also
http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main/a/alpine/alpine_2.11+dfsg1-2_changelog
has a new upstream release as taking place in 2013.
Development on the original University of Washington alpine has indeed
ceased.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/04092014171043.a4601fe92c94@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list