Hi, Larry: I'm absolutely not competent to give you a comparison between slrn and trn. I use usenet very infrequently anymore, and I wasn't even aware trn was still being packaged. If you have it working and it meets your needs, absolutely stay with it. Janina Hart Larry writes: > Well Jinina, I may have checked out slrn years ago, but forgot what > it was like. Meanwhile since I asked this, I discovered that > running the current trn version 4.0 test 77 in Debian, so far I can > actually load a 7million article binary group. Far beyound my > wildest dreams. > Please inform what I would like better of slrn over trn? Thanks so > much-and-your other reply on errors in a console. > Hart > > _______________________________________________ > Blinux-list mailing list > Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list -- Janina Sajka, Phone: +1.443.300.2200 sip:janina@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Chair, Open Accessibility janina@xxxxxxxx Linux Foundation http://a11y.org Chair, Protocols & Formats Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/wai/pf World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) _______________________________________________ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list