sounds like even more of a reason not to use windows lol.
Thanks for the tip. Aside from freedos, there is the enhanced edition of
dr dos too.
i have ms dos 7.1, the one that ran under wind 98 too, but it does tend to
be rather picky as you say, making incorporating other tools a bit hard.
Thanks for the story,
Karen
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, John Heim wrote:
I messed around with FreeDOS quite a bit last summer. I got it working with
jaws for DOS. I was planning on making a bootable CD with FreeDOS, jaws for
DOS, and the Win XP installation files. But it didn't work because the
Windows setup program wouldn't work under FreeDOS.
I got a bootable diskette with FreeDOS and jaws for DOS though. So I had it
so that my PC would come up talking when booted from a diskette which means I
could have made a bootable CD that comes up talking. I never bothered though
because what would be the point? If you could install Windows, it would be
worthwhile. But otherwise, grml is better.
Let me tell you though, I was pretty excited for a while there. The Windows
setup program runs under FreeDOS but it craps out when it comes to
recognizing the disk. There's something about the FreDOS FAT32 driver that
the setup program didn't like. But when I ran that setup program and was able
to answer the first few questions, I was pretty darn excited. I thought all
I had to do was feed it an unattended.txt file and I'd be golden! But it
didn't work. Maybe by now FreeDOS has that fixed.
There is a very active FreeDOS support email list. I would recommend googling
for it and joining up if you get into FreeDOS.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Tony Baechler" <tony@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Linux for blind general discussion" <blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 1:06 AM
Subject: Re: Quick question before I do something silly?
Hi,
Linux reads fat32 just fine. I've used it to recover drives before. I
would suggest using FreeDOS. It has finally passed the version 1.0 mark
and seems fairly stable, at least on a virtual machine. Also it's shipped
with dosemu if you wanted to run your DOS programs under Linux for
whatever reason. Several years ago, I ran Windows 98 and Linux on one
machine. It worked but I think FreeDOS is probably better. Of course
there is OpenDOS but it doesn't seem as stable to me and isn't as open
source. FreeDOS obviously is completely open source and has several CD
images to pick from. It seemed to work well with a screen reader, again
on a virtual machine.
_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list