Re: Pine vs mutt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I am running both pine and alpine on the same machine so you don't have to uninstall one to install the other. In fact alpine will pick up your pine configuration and work just fine.

Tom

On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, Jan and Bertil Smark Nilsson wrote:

Good evening,

On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Lorenzo Taylor wrote:

For those who still wish to use pine, I would rather recommend alpine.
It is the recoded open-source version of pine and behaves nearly
identically. The difference is that alpine is open-source, newer and
still maintained by its developers, who are the same people who brought
us pine. The other main difference is that it is included in Debian and
Ubuntu. It can be installed by using apt-get, so you don't have to
download a .deb package from elsewhere.

Thanks. I didn't know that. It looks interesting. However, you have to uninstall pine before installing alpine.

Regards,

Bertil

_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list


_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Speakup]     [Fedora]     [Linux Kernel]     [Yosemite News]     [Big List of Linux Books]