On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 08:39:57PM -0400, J. Greer wrote: > I have generally found Suse to be more user friendly and easier to >maintain than Debian or Red Hat. I'm absolutely not sharing this point of vue sicne: - my sighted partner had a suse 9.3 who was only configurable via yast yast yast and you were punished by overrides if you took the risc of going editing a specific file, while this is the most versatile under Debian - since my girlfriend replaces her suse 9.3 with a Sarge stable, we are again able to use sound with no "windowk-alike conflicts" like under suse's kde desktop - since I'm the technician at home, I can much better help her under Debian than SuSE since Debian doesn't prohibit you to edit by hand file x or y or z - finally, why should you pay for something who wasn't working better than a free and gratis distro? Note that I can't say anithing about RH or Fedora since I hadn't tried it, but suse versus deb, I know and she knows the difference now! But of course, someone may prefer doing all via yast and you; why not! Aldo. _______________________________________________ Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list