Re: Fedora core 3 and oralux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I don't understand your questions about linux on a removable hard disk. You need to explain what you want to do there in order for me to know how to tell you to proceed.

When you install linux, it should detect your sound card and configure the proper sound drivers. There are people on this list who know more about installing fedora than I do. There is something called speakup that allows you to install fedora if you have a hardware speech synthesizer. You can probably just google that.

I still install linux via what is called a "serial console". If you have another machine that already has speech on it, what you can do is connect them via a special cable called a null-modem cable. Then you run a terminal emulator on the
machine that has speech and install linux that way. There is plenty of documentation on the web about how to do that too.



At 11:34 AM 2/25/2005, Shaun Everiss wrote:
what about sound etc?
Also the local tech where I studdy has this thing about having linux windows and dos on a removable hard disk.
I have a windows machine, and I am trying to get a dos machine.
But this linux on a removable hard disk, I get told that because it requires hardware drivers that it can't go on laptops or can only stay on one machine.
Yet tech must have a way to move it around on a drive since people have to take it home.
Unless we have a version installed there and a version installed here.
But then why the removable hard drive.
Its all confusing.
At 04:19 a.m. 26/02/2005, you wrote:
>At 10:15 AM 2/24/2005, Shaun Everiss wrote:
>Is it therefore easier to have a seperate machine for dos or is the windows xp console suffishient, or
>
>
>My opinion is that as a new user, it is best to have a seperate machine for linux. Something like fedora will install easily on a used computer, you'll be able to take all the defaults and have a working machine in short order. That will settle your boot loader question too because whatever linux distrabution you choose will have a default boot loader.
>
>Where I live, it is easy to acquire a computer to run linux because linux is far less demanding in it's hardware requirements than Windows. I got my linux machine for free from someone because they were going to just throw it out and they'd have had to pay the city $20 to dispose of it. I don't know what things are like where you are but my opinion is that you should try to find an inexpensive used machine on which to install linux.
>
>_______________________________________________
>
>Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list



_______________________________________________ Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list

_______________________________________________ Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Speakup]     [Fedora]     [Linux Kernel]     [Yosemite News]     [Big List of Linux Books]