Re: How similar is commercial Linux?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At the University of Wisconsin, we have switched over to Red Hat Advanced server from various Red Hat versions , mostly 7 through 9. I was at 9 when I installed AS 3.0.

I actually had some problems with RH AS that I didn't have with RH 9. The network connection occasionally gets really slow. And the error messages in the syslog don't mean anything to anybody I have asked. That includes on usenet and on the mailing lest of the local lug.

I can fix the problem temporarily by restarting network services so it's not a killer. It's good thing this is not a production machine though.

Another problem we had was that the quota command and the du command gave different results. You can find out how much space a directory tree takes up with the du command. Theoretically, the quota command should give the same number if all the files in that directory are owned by the same user and that user has no files outside that directory tree.

But it didn't. So a user might put 50 Mb of files on our machine and the quota command would report that he had 30 Mb. Sometimes it was more, sometimes it was less.

I never saw these problems in RH 9. I know the networking problem wasn't there before I installed RH AS. And I tested the quota system plenty before installing RH AS and never noticed any inconsistencies.

The reason why we are still using RH AS is that Oracle supports it and not fedora.







At 12:16 PM 10/15/2004, Lee Maschmeyer you wrote:
Hi all,

When our site discontinued its 35+ year use of IBM mainframe-based software for its administrative tasks, it switched to Solaris. At the time, brltty ran only on Linux, and since Sun-Linux docs said it would be patterned after Red Hat 7, I installed Red Hat on my home and work computers.

Now we're starting to investigate Red Hat Enterprise Linux, and since I'm literally the only one around here who uses Linux of any sort they're asking me a lot of questions.

How portable is my experience with Red Hat versions from 8 to Fedora 2 (soon to include Fedora 3 which is slated for release ca. November 1)? Is Enterprise Linux Desktop about comparable to Fedora, 4 CDs etc? Does anybody know how big Enterprise Linux AS is and how the file layouts and included products compare?

Thanks much for any info,

--
Lee Maschmeyer
<lee_maschmeyer@xxxxxxxxx>

"Never imagine yourself not to be otherwise than what it might appear
to others that what you were or might have been was not otherwise than
what you had been would have appeared to them to be otherwise."
    --Lewis Carroll

_______________________________________________

Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list

_______________________________________________ Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Speakup]     [Fedora]     [Linux Kernel]     [Yosemite News]     [Big List of Linux Books]