Re: Changing the behaviour of ls, possibly via a script

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Changing the behaviour of ls, possibly via a script
From: Luke Davis <ldavis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 23:11:55 -0500 (CDT)
In-reply-to: <411D38DD.70008@thechases.com>
Organization: "Tacticus Communications, Inc."
Sender: blinux-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx

No.  I didn't realize that he didn't want a hardlink count.

On Fri, 13 Aug 2004, Tim Chase wrote:

Does your version of ls return something else in the 2nd column?

-tim

_______________________________________________

Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list

References:
- Changing the behaviour of ls, possibly via a script
  - From: Lorenzo Prince
- Re: Changing the behaviour of ls, possibly via a script
  - From: Tim Chase
- Re: Changing the behaviour of ls, possibly via a script
  - From: Luke Davis
- Re: Changing the behaviour of ls, possibly via a script
  - From: Tim Chase

Prev by Date: Re: Changing the behaviour of ls, possibly via a script
Next by Date: debian going in to maintenance mode?
Previous by thread: Re: Changing the behaviour of ls, possibly via a script
Next by thread: Re: Changing the behaviour of ls, possibly via a script
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Speakup] [Fedora] [Linux Kernel] [Yosemite News] [Big List of Linux Books]