My bad--I just reread my original message, and saw the ambiguousness of the statement. Post-patch, there seems to be no difference in the bookmark manager. What should I hear, for example, if I do a "read current line", move the cursor, and so on? On Sun, 28 Mar 2004, Nath wrote: > Luke Davis <ldavis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > This patch didn't work on a FreeBSD links, 2.1pre14. > > Did anyone else have different results, and if so, where does one go > > within the program to demonstrait them? > > > Ah ? Here i applied the patch on the same links version (2.1pre14) on a > debian testing distro and it works perfectly. > What does not work exactly : applying the patch or using the bookmark > manager after the patch has been applied ? > > On Sat, 27 Mar 2004, Jude DaShiell wrote: > > > >> I'm wondering, did he use cprintf() heavily in his coding? That might be > >> why that package doesn't speak all that well with speakup. Technically if > >> a program is written so it has only a single print statement in it that > >> prints print_string and print_string is manipulated to provide the proper > >> screen output fixing a problem with cprintf() would be a trivial matter of > >> an if/else statement with a printf() added in on its other half testing > >> argv[] for a command line switch. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> > >> Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx > >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list