Got it. Hadn't looked far enough back in the pile of email. Thanks Tom ----- Original Message ----- From: "technomage" <technomage-hawke@xxxxxxx> To: <blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 05:08 Subject: Re: Fw: [pro_tech] Study: Safest OS isn't Windows--or Linux > I was not the one that originally printed the article. I commented on it. the > link should have been included. > > I may have missed it in the original posting. a cursorysearch of zdnet might > be in order though.... Still, I really don't trust zdnet to be fair about > things other than windows. > > Technomage Hawke > > On Tuesday 24 February 2004 05:41 am, Tom Masterson wrote: > > Do you have the link to the rest of the article? > > > > By the way the statement you printed is nothing new nor is it untrue. I am > > not an expert in linux but I do know that it is only as secure as you have > > the ability and know how to make it so by closing the purts and entry > > points. There is no totally safe OS except the one that is on a standalone > > machine that is never hooked to a network (internet especially) and rarely > > gets new software on it. > > > > Tom > > > _______________________________________________ > > Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list > _______________________________________________ Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list