Some people are awfully touchy. I don't mind helping, but no reason I should be asked to put up with this rudeness. I expect spam is worse for the blind simply because I reckon I can read faster than you can. If I'm wrong, fine, but your little outburst doesn't help anyone. I can look at a list and spot the likely spam without conciously reading it. And sure you can use procmail filters. I don't reckon my mother can though. I've used procmail filters for years, I've got quite a considerable collection of procmail filters. At best, I reckon they catch about half the spam. In contrast, an email address that only accepts email from a limited number of addresses is quite difficult to spam. Unless you can create your own accounts at will on your own computer, then the only way you can have such an account is to buy one or use a free one. Hotmail accounts aren't very good, I know places that unconditionally drop all mail from hotmail.com. On Tuesday 20 August 2002 17:53, Shaun Oliver wrote: > h, for heaven's sake. Why would it be worse for a blind person to get > spam? -- Cheers John. Please, no off-list mail. You will fall foul of my spam treatment. Join the "Linux Support by Small Businesses" list at http://mail.computerdatasafe.com.au/mailman/listinfo/lssb