Re: [PATCH] docs: add backporting and conflict resolution document

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> This is a new document based on my 2022 blog post:
> Although this is aimed at stable contributors and distro maintainers, it
> does also contain useful tips and tricks for anybody who needs to
> resolve merge conflicts.
> By adding this to the kernel as documentation we can more easily point
> to it e.g. from stable emails about failed backports, as well as allow
> the community to modify it over time if necessary.
> I've added this under process/ since it also has
> process/applying-patches.rst. Another interesting document is
> maintainer/rebasing-and-merging.rst which maybe should eventually refer
> to this one, but I'm leaving that as a future cleanup.
> Thanks to Harshit for helping with the original blog post as well as
> this updated document.
> Cc: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/process/backporting.rst | 488 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  Documentation/process/index.rst       |   1 +
>  2 files changed, 489 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/process/backporting.rst

So I'm not seeing a lot of discussion here; I guess it's almost perfect
:)  I would request, though, that you send me a version that conforms to
our conventions for heading markup, as described in



To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux