On Mon, 2022-02-07 at 11:09 +0000, Jiaxun Yang wrote: > > 在 2022/2/7 10:50, Johannes Berg 写道: > > On Mon, 2022-02-07 at 10:15 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > On Mon, 2022-02-07 at 01:19 +0000, Jiaxun Yang wrote: > > > > Hi backport forks, > > > > > > > > I was trying to fix ckmake FAIL building against 4.9 for 4.9.297+. > > > > > > > > I found that macro KERNEL_VERSION_IN_RANGE(4,9,297, 4,10,0) won't work > > > > because SUBLEVEL 297 had overflowed 4 bit (255) in KERNEL_VERSION. > > > > > > > > How are we supposed to deal with such situation? > > > > > > > Hm. I guess the only way would be to somehow make a Kconfig variable in > > > backports, that uses the Makefile settings? But env="SUBLEVEL" doesn't > > > work, so not sure, maybe some Makefile trickery to extract it and write > > > it to the config? > Or is it possible to persuade stable forks to define LINUX_VERSION_SUBLEVEL > on existing stable releases? Probably not. > > > > > Or just find a way to handle the specific area? Is this for the > > build_bug.h stuff? > Yes, any idea? > Looking at commit b29eec6c49, does it even matter? We can continue using bug.h which includes build_bug.h, it's just pulling in more than needed. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in
