Re: backports spatch question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On 7/5/21 11:41 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Mon, 2021-07-05 at 13:30 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
So next problem is kcov stuff.  This is just FYI, I'll just revert this
patch since I don't need it.

I guess that works, but FWIW, I did point you to our tree already
earlier in the thread and generally we do have backports there for
everything we needed. In this instance:


Oh, I thought you had a full kernel tree somewhere that you ran upstream 'backports' against.

Either way, after kcov, there was another hack to fix some stats logic, a hack for mt76,
and then everything compiled.  I'll run-time test it today.


Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Candela Technologies Inc
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux