On 2/2/21 2:29 PM, Daze Urey wrote:
From 7c615a7077e37ca5fc3ba5ad7ebe41441521fcd5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: lunaticurey <125438787@xxxxxx <mailto:125438787@xxxxxx>>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 21:23:53 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] backports: fix timekeeping ktime_get_raw_ts64 in
kernel under 3.19 we should use struct timespec instead of timespec64
. this
can fix compile in linux 3.18 t Signed-off-by: lunaticurey
<125438787@xxxxxx <mailto:125438787@xxxxxx>>
Signed-off-by: lunaticurey <125438787@xxxxxx <mailto:125438787@xxxxxx>>
Hi,
It looks like this mail is white space damaged. I would suggest to use
git send-email to send patches, this takes care that it is correctly send.
Please use your real name in the Signed-off-by line.
The change itself looks good to me.
Hauke
---
backport/backport-include/linux/timekeeping.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/backport/backport-include/linux/timekeeping.h
b/backport/backport-include/linux/timekeeping.h
index 25ceaf3..fc2b75e 100644
--- a/backport/backport-include/linux/timekeeping.h
+++ b/backport/backport-include/linux/timekeeping.h
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ static inline struct timespec64
timespec_to_timespec64(const struct timespec ts)
static inline void ktime_get_raw_ts64(struct timespec64 *ts)
{
#if LINUX_VERSION_IS_LESS(3,19,0)
- struct timespec64 ts64;
+ struct timespec ts64;
getrawmonotonic(&ts64);
*ts = timespec_to_timespec64(ts64);
--
2.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in
