Re: [PATCH 2/3] backports: skbuff: add skb_list_walk_safe() and skb_mark_not_on_list()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/12/20 4:59 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  backport/backport-include/linux/skbuff.h | 11 +++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/backport/backport-include/linux/skbuff.h b/backport/backport-include/linux/skbuff.h
> index 8af34146432e..3b63ce76a0b5 100644
> --- a/backport/backport-include/linux/skbuff.h
> +++ b/backport/backport-include/linux/skbuff.h
> @@ -380,6 +380,11 @@ static inline struct sk_buff *__skb_peek(const struct sk_buff_head *list_)
>  {
>  	return list_->next;
>  }
> +
> +static inline void skb_mark_not_on_list(struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> +	skb->next = NULL;
> +}
>  #endif

skb_mark_not_on_list() was backported to kernel 4.19.10 and this
definition conflicts.

I added this around it:
#if !LINUX_VERSION_IN_RANGE(4,19,10, 4,20,0)

Hauke

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux