Re: [PATCH 2/2] backports: add the necessary backports for netlink extack

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2017-04-21 at 20:50 +0200, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
> On 21-4-2017 12:47, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> I did not follow everything about this extack thing, but does it
> impose a version requirement on the libnl used in user-space?

No. It turns out that libnl doesn't care at all about the ack message
contents, so you can use any version.

Here's a sample iw patch:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jberg/iw.git/commit/?h=bpf&id=7105f7614c13680306cf3b91ad8711eccfa70df3

> > +/* this is for patches we apply */
> 
> Guess the comment is inspired by the one below ;-) but would it not
> be a bit more clear to say:
> 
> /* this is for files patched using 0078-genl-extack.cocci */

Yeah I guess that'd make some sense :)

Though realistically none of it is really all that necessary since one
can always grep ;-)

johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux