On 16-3-2017 0:45, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > Hey Arend, > > On 15 March 2017 at 16:40, Arend Van Spriel > <arend.vanspriel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > [..] >> >> I honestly don't know the current state of backports integration >> feature. My use-case is creating a tarball that can be built against any >> target kernel. >> >> In your case can you try it with v4.4 kernel? >> > > Well, not surprisingly it works. Mostly because the errors I've mentioned > (except the coccinelle one) are related exclusively to kernel integration. Yeah, I meant retry kernel integration with the v4.4 kernel instead of v4.4.53. However, I think we can safely assume kernel integration to be broken. Not sure whether Johannes want to support it moving forward. I think for now it has low priority. Regards, Arend -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in
