Re: [PATCH] backports: genetlink: define GENL_UNS_ADMIN_PERM as GENL_ADMIN_PERM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2016-08-16 at 21:12 +0200, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
> On 16-8-2016 11:20, Luca Coelho wrote:
> > 
> > From: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@xxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Older kernels don't have support for GENL_UNS_ADMIN_PERM.  So, if
> > it
> > is not defined, use the previous GENL_ADMIN_PERM permission
> > instead.
> 
> I posted a patch for this May 17.

Argh, this was again from my "deafness" window.  I googled and only
found your v1, which was NAKed by Johannes.  Missed v2, sorry.


> > 
> > Change-Id: I4c845de0d5b326aff8400df22a23595ef9cd12aa
> 
> and this is gerrit noise :-)

Gr.  And now I am growling. :P

About your patch, why didn't you add to uapi/linux/ as I did? I saw you
mentioned some inclusion problems, but I didn't run into any.

--
Cheers,
Luca.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux