On 10-7-2016 23:16, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > On 06/05/2016 11:30 AM, Arend van Spriel wrote: >> Speed definition for usb3.1 has been added in 4.6 kernel. Add >> definiton for older kernels. >> >> Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> backport/backport-include/linux/usb/ch9.h | 4 ++++ >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/backport/backport-include/linux/usb/ch9.h b/backport/backport-include/linux/usb/ch9.h >> index 135e24c..c42fc30 100644 >> --- a/backport/backport-include/linux/usb/ch9.h >> +++ b/backport/backport-include/linux/usb/ch9.h >> @@ -21,4 +21,8 @@ static inline int usb_endpoint_maxp(const struct usb_endpoint_descriptor *epd) >> } >> #endif /* < 3.2 */ >> >> +#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(4,6,0) >> +#define USB_SPEED_SUPER_PLUS (USB_SPEED_SUPER + 1) >> +#endif /* < 4.6 */ >> + >> #endif /* __BACKPORT__LINUX_USB_CH9_H */ >> > > This is in a emum in the mainline kernel. I think this will cause some > warnings when backporting it this way. The way it is used in brcmfmac I do not get a warning, but I agree it would not work if this value is used calling a function that expects enum usb_device_speed. So how would you backport this? Regards, Arend -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in
