Re: [PATCH] backports: deal better with possible_net_t

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/07/2015 10:42 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> From: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Instead of just assuming CONFIG_NET_NS is defined, deal with
> this better. Sadly, it needs a header file patch (as an spatch
> doesn't deal properly with header files.)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  backport/backport-include/net/net_namespace.h      | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>  .../network/0053-possible_net_t.patch              | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 patches/collateral-evolutions/network/0053-possible_net_t.patch
> 

Thank you for the patch, I applied and pushed it out.

Hauke
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux