Re: Possible to build-in backports modules into kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi there,

> > > https://backports.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Documentation/integration
thanks for your comments and the link. I skip that before as I thought it's actually for
backports developers, not users. I'll read it more carefully.

> > Just to clarify, the entire kernel will need to be built from some tree. In my 
> > reading of the original post, I got the impression that Petr wanted to use a 
> > pre-built kernel.

> Yes, indeed, that's not possible - and doesn't really make sense anyway,
> since if you have access to the kernel image and sources to build
> against, you might as well rebuild the whole kernel.

I'm stack with very old kernel (2.6.37 for arm TI's DM365). No pre-built kernel , I've
built the kernel as well, everything is working nice. But as I use embedded device, it
would be nice to have the drivers build-in (performance).

For some of modules I get message: "This feature depends on another which has been
configured as a module. As a result, this feature will be built as a module.". I'll try to
find the dependency, but is there any hint, how to search?

Thanks a lot for backports, it helped me already :-).

Kind regards,
Petr
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux