Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] backports: add kernel integration support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Johannes Berg
<johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-11-14 at 12:52 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Johannes Berg
>> <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 00:14 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> >> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@xxxxxxxx>
>> >>
>> >> This third series should hopefully address all pending feedback.
>> >> I've split out patches even more, but more importantly have
>> >> made the parser simpler by both integrating the logic required
>> >> to understand a backport by identifying the backport by type
>> >> and strategy, sharing that, and then providing ignore lists on
>> >> the parsers.
>> >
>> > I think from a code change POV I should be OK with this, but I'll
>> > definitely want to run it and see the differences. I'll have to do that
>> > next week, it's getting late here.
>>
>> OK. So I shouldn't merge yet?
>
> I would prefer you didn't, but OTOH we can always fix up issues later as
> well.

I'll wait.

 Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux