On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 10:19:14PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 21:11 +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > This does mean that bp_prefix topic *can* also be tied down > > with this other directory prefix as a form of 'builder' for > > integration. Making the prefix configurable would make sense > > then only if also making the directory prefix should be > > configurable. > > Indeed. > > > I think we're better off right now with just supporting two > > approaches with their own directory prefix, and prefixes > > for variables. > > Sure, that's fine. I have no issues with either, but I'd like to see the > two cases actually combined and separated, in the sense that you don't > have magic code that tries both and just succeeds on one, but only have > code that tries the right thing. Fair enough. Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
