On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 08:54:11AM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 19:18 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@xxxxxxxx> > > > > During development of kernel integration support using CONFIG_BACKPORT > > was evaluated as a prefix over CPTCFG even for packaging backports, > > for some reason this change lifted some restrictions one some device > > drivers which was present before and as such requires some changes to > > the dependencies map file to ensure correct compilation for respective > > kernel versions. > > This is confusing ... I think what you're trying to say is that you > noticed it because your integration system was broken and not honouring > restrictions properly? No I verified each reported case I got and verified the issues found were valid. For some reason some of these drivers were not allowed to compile on some older versions, and from what me and Hauke could tell they should, but they weren't. So the new annotations on requirements are valid. Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
