On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 19:18 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@xxxxxxxx> > > In order to help unify the naming scheme for shared > backports versioning information rely on the CPTCFG_ > prefix, when integration support gets added that will > translate to the respective CONFIG_BACKPORT_ prefix. > Kconfig opt env entries don't get propagated out, so > we need to define these ourselves. This leaves all > other names in place for packaging and just focuses > on sharing on the C / header code. What difference does this make? It'll break some scripting that we have for sure (assuming the BACKPORTED_ prefix), so naturally I'd like to see why it is necessary. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
