Re: Removal of regulator framework

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> carrying some regularity drivers which are needed for some specific
> media driver does not look like a big problem. The current problem from
> my side is that we carry all regularity drivers by default and that
> causes some problems. Many of these driver are used only on one specific
> SoC product line and uses their often changing interface, so they break
> often.
>
> When all the regulator drivers are only needed for the media driver I
> would add just add the driver which are actually used by a shipped media
> driver and nothing more.

Makes sense. I'm suggesting we can trim even more by only keeping
media drivers we really should care for and its dependencies. We need
a white list then, do we want to start off with perhaps the list I
posted? Media folks, is there anything else we should carry that would
help the media folks?

  Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux