On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Alexander Aring <alex.aring@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:03:58PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@xxxxxxxx> >> >> Johannes noted this is not needed, all of the fragment >> accessors don't need CONFIG_NET_NS. This goes test compiled with >> CONFIG_BT_6LOWPAN=y and a disabled CONFIG_NET_NS. >> > > a little note about this here. There exists two 6LoWPAN standard. One > for bluetooth low energy and one for IEEE 802.15.4. > > The actual namespace is only for IEEE 802.15.4, because we need > fragmentation there. 6LoWPAN fragmentation for bluetooth low energy is > already handled by the MAC-Layer. So this has nothing to do with > CONFIG_BT_6LOWPAN. Thanks for the clarification, I actually did mean CONFIG_IEEE802154_6LOWPAN however, I goofed that on the commit log. Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
