Re: [PATCH 26/27] backports: convert threaded IRQ suport into an SmPL patch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Johannes Berg
<johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-04-07 at 10:19 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 3:31 AM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Sat, 2014-04-05 at 05:41 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> >
>> >> ++ret = compat_request_threaded_irq(&private->irq_compat,
>> >
>> > Whhy not go to backport namespace too?
>>
>> Sure, how about as a second patch?
>
> Sure, I was just wondering if there was a particular reason you didn't
> while you rewrote the whole thing anyway.

Well this patch didn't touch the header files, just the usage, that's all.

  Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux