On 11/04/2013 11:32 PM, James Hilliard wrote: > Should I attempt to build the regular version or the version from the > backports package? It is probably easier to use the version from backports. Hauke > > > On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@xxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:hauke@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > On 11/04/2013 05:50 PM, James Hilliard wrote: > > I was wondering if you might have any suggestions on how to > backport the > > sch_codel and sch_fq_codel modules to kernel version 2.6.22, it looks > > like it is only compatible down to 2.6.25 so far. This would be useful > > for broadcom routers running on firmware variants based on the > broadcom > > SDK kernel. > > Hi James, > > backports currently does not support any kernel older than 2.6.25. There > was support for kernel 2.6.24 some time ago, and it could be that it is > not too hard to make sch_codel and sch_fq_codel work with kernel 2.6.22. > > You should try to build it against that old kernel and try to fix the > problems you get. You should remove all the other stuff you do not need > like wireless from backports. > > Hauke > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
