On 10/18/2013 05:28 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: > From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx> > > Introduce the infrastructure to apply semantic patches > and make use of it for the (frequently breaking) portid > patch for netlink. > > Unfortunately this is significantly slower: > > before: > real 0m14.312s > user 0m12.144s > sys 0m1.784s > > after: > real 0m25.932s > user 0m21.768s > sys 0m2.932s > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > gentree.py | 36 +++ > .../network/0005-netlink-portid.cocci | 25 ++ > .../network/0005-netlink-portid/INFO | 42 ---- > .../0005-netlink-portid/mac80211_hwsim.patch | 24 -- > .../network/0005-netlink-portid/nl80211.patch | 267 --------------------- > 5 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 333 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 patches/collateral-evolutions/network/0005-netlink-portid.cocci > delete mode 100644 patches/collateral-evolutions/network/0005-netlink-portid/INFO > delete mode 100644 patches/collateral-evolutions/network/0005-netlink-portid/mac80211_hwsim.patch > delete mode 100644 patches/collateral-evolutions/network/0005-netlink-portid/nl80211.patch Getting rid of the big patches and replacing them with a semantic patch is worth the extra time needed. Would you like to resend it with the other netlink-portid patches (nfc, ieee80154) also removed or should I add that to the patch. Hauke -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
