Re: [RFC] backports: replace netlink portid by semantic patch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/18/2013 05:28 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Introduce the infrastructure to apply semantic patches
> and make use of it for the (frequently breaking) portid
> patch for netlink.
> 
> Unfortunately this is significantly slower:
> 
> before:
> real    0m14.312s
> user    0m12.144s
> sys     0m1.784s
> 
> after:
> real    0m25.932s
> user    0m21.768s
> sys     0m2.932s
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx>

There are two more patches doing the same thing for other subsystems, I
hope we could also replace the patches with this semantic patch:

patches/collateral-evolutions/nfc/01-netlink-portid/net_nfc_netlink.patch
patches/collateral-evolutions/ieee802154/0001-netlink-portid/ieee802154.patch

How fast would it be when one more semantic patch would be added would
it increase in the same way? I am wondering if this is a constant
increase or does it depend on the number of patches.

Hauke
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux