Re: ww_mutex compile warning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:45:12PM +0200, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> Hi Luis,
> 
> The empty implementations of owner_running() and mutex_spin_on_owner()
> in backport/compat/kernel/ww_mutex.c should return something (one an in,
> one an bool), but they don't. That causes a compile warning about a
> missing return statement with kernel 3.9. I do not understand that code,
> could you please have a look into that.

Sure here's the fix, I'll submit. Thanks for reporting this.

  Luis

diff --git a/backport/compat/kernel/ww_mutex.c b/backport/compat/kernel/ww_mutex.c
index 257c2a4..204ac8f 100644
--- a/backport/compat/kernel/ww_mutex.c
+++ b/backport/compat/kernel/ww_mutex.c
@@ -206,10 +206,12 @@ static void mspin_unlock(struct mspin_node **lock, struct mspin_node *node)
 
 static inline bool owner_running(struct mutex *lock, struct task_struct *owner)
 {
+	return false;
 }
 
 int mutex_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock, struct task_struct *owner)
 {
+	return 1;
 }
 
 static inline int mutex_can_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux