On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> This is not a very good idea. Although setting drvdata to NULL allowed >> a lot of code to be removed, it also exposed a bunch of hidden bugs -- >> drivers were using the drvdata value even after their remove function >> returned. > > Eek, have we not SmPL'ify'd a proof yet to ensure code like this no > longer exists? Julia? :) Come to think of it, perhaps we should require *proof* with SmPL like this in future to avoid regressions ? Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
