On Wed, 2013-04-10 at 12:19 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > However, it seems entirely pointless to backport just a small part of > > the API? > > Oh I agree don't get me wrong, however porting kernel/async.c seems > like a rather separate effort worth considering. As-is though I have > not seen any negative impact though to keep older subsystems from > compiling, ie its a no-op for older kernels as I see it. I guess that's what I don't understand -- I don't see usages of ASYNC_DOMAIN_EXCLUSIVE in any header files, and in e.g. regulator/core.c you'd also need the functions async_schedule_domain() etc. So where does this help even compiling? johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
