Hi Walt, Jan-Simon and SAT members FYI https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AwAFDf52f_FoXksbHEVUMlu4hpcI0JMGVG-Kj_sUkyc/ BR. Yuichi Kusakabe. ________________________________ 差出人: automated-testing-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <automated-testing-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> が Rich Persaud <persaur@xxxxxxxxx> の代理で送信 送信日時: 2019年10月25日 9:08 宛先: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> CC: openembedded-architecture <openembedded-architecture@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; automated-testing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <automated-testing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 件名: Re: [Automated-testing] [Openembedded-architecture] Yocto Project LTS Proposal/Discussion (adding the automated-testing list) On Oct 24, 2019, at 18:52, Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: I'm posting this to openembedded-architecture since it probably is the best place for discussions about OE/Yocto planning. The Yocto Project TSC believes one of the things needed for YP and for OE is more information being pulled together about how an LTS release could work. The document linked to below is the information it was able to collate together on the subject. Its the result of some long discussions by the TSC. ... The key thing needed to make this happen is a resource commitment to it. Without such a commitment it is simply not feasible. Vendors who provide commercial support for OE/Yocto-based products may already be investing downstream resources for equivalent "LTS" support. May be useful for the document to show the financial benefits of shifting a percentage of downstream LTS validation resources to upstream Yocto LTS. There may be new companies willing to join the project in order to make it happen, if so we should talk further. The document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AwAFDf52f_FoXksbHEVUMlu4hpcI0JMGVG-Kj_sUkyc/ > The project components to be covered would need to match those included in our standard release process and should be clearly defined. Those components would be: > Bitbake > OE-Core > Meta-yocto > yocto-docs ... > For simplicity, it is also proposed that only automated testing be used for testing the LTS and that any current manual QA is not performed. ... > Only run virtualized tests > Only support one host distro, an Ubuntu LTS as it has right lifespan When the first Yocto LTS release is available, could that become the host distro for automated testing? That would provide Yocto automated testing with supply chain integrity benefits from Yocto. If we take that path, with automated testing based on virtualization, could we add meta-virtualization to the list of Yocto LTS release components? Yocto-on-Yocto automated testing could reduce risks [1] that impact software supply chains. A potential topic for the ATS event [2] next week. Rich [1] https://www.platformsecuritysummit.com/2019/speaker/sherman/ [2] https://elinux.org/Automated_Testing_Summit_2019 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#7786): https://lists.automotivelinux.org/g/agl-dev-community/message/7786 Mute This Topic: https://lists.automotivelinux.org/mt/37473834/2167316 Group Owner: agl-dev-community+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Unsubscribe: https://lists.automotivelinux.org/g/agl-dev-community/leave/4543822/883735764/xyzzy [list-automotive-discussions82@xxxxxxxxxxx] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-- _______________________________________________ automated-testing mailing list automated-testing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/automated-testing
