Hi Scott,
Thanks, my host is ubuntu 16.04 on x64
Machine.
What do you mean by " recent experience, such problems are a bit more likely with the
crosssdk target than the images"?
crosssdk target than the images"?
Thanks for your information.
Vahid
On Jun 20, 2019 02:03, "Scott Murray" <scott.murray@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jun 2019, Walt Miner wrote:> > *bitbake agl-image-minimal-crosssdk* is possible?
> Scott Murray?
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 9:26 AM Vahid Gharaee <vgharaee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Dear all,
> >> > PS. I am doing it for *imx6qdlsabreauto *(since graphical image is not
> >
> > anyone has done it? or there is a substitute?
> >> >> on master branch for imx6 and *minimal-image-sdk*
> > ready yet)
> >
> > kind regards
> > Vahid
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 7:49 PM Vahid Gharaee <vgharaee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Dear all,> >> I also successfully bitbaked *minimal-image !*
> >> I get this error:
> >> gdb-cross-canadian-arm do_compile failed
> >>
> >> I tried IMAGE_INSTALL_remove on this, No luck!!
> >> any one know the reason ?
> >>
> >> PS: the log says python 3.5 and mpfr packages are missed! aren't they
> >> supposed to be in
> >> the recipes?
It's building for me here (I'm using an older Debian release in a
container). The failures you're seeing almost suggest a host
compatibility issue, what are you trying to build on? Based on
recent experience, such problems are a bit more likely with the
crosssdk target than the images.
Scott
_______________________________________________ automotive-discussions mailing list automotive-discussions@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/automotive-discussions
