Hi Ian, On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 10:53:31AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > On 9/7/23 22:57, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > Hi > > > > The following sort of regression was noticed while updating a client > > running Debian buster (with autofs 5.1.2 based) to Debian bullseye > > (5.1.7 based autofs), but verified it's still present with 5.1.8. The > > folloing setup is present: > > > > There is a NFS server, dualstacked, with both public IPv4 and IPv6 > > addresses resolvable in DNS. As I cannot put the public IPs here in > > the report, let's assume It is called nfs-server with addresses > > 192.168.122.188 and fc00:192:168:122::188. > > I assume the IPv6 address here is not what's used in practice. It > > doesn't look valid, it doesn't look like an IPv4 mapped address, what > > is it, how was it constructed? I'm sorry this was just me trying to use something valid from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unique_local_address . Yes this is nto the IPv6 address which the server has in practice. Regards, Salvatore
