Re: [PATCH] Explain /etc/auto.master.d usage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 09:03:09AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-03-14 at 23:13 +0000, Vincent.Mcintyre@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> > I've noticed people have difficulty fully parsing the rather terse
> > description in samples/auto.master, eg bugs.debian.org/693782.
> > Give a specific example of the usage to make understanding easier.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Vincent McIntyre <vincent.mcintyre@xxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > diff --git a/man/auto.master.5.in b/man/auto.master.5.in
> > index 68242d4..ee83794 100644
> > --- a/man/auto.master.5.in
> > +++ b/man/auto.master.5.in
> > @@ -383,6 +383,20 @@ All accesses to paths in the map
> >  will trigger mounts when they are accessed and the Name Service Switch
> >  configuration will be used to locate the source of the map
> >  .IR auto.data .
> > +.sp
> > +To avoid making edits to @@autofsmapdir@@/auto.master,
> > +@@autofsmapdir@@/auto.master.d may be used.
> > +Files in that directory must have an ".autofs" suffix, e.g.
> > +.IR @@autofsmapdir@@/auto.master.d/extra.autofs.
> > +Such files contain lines of the same format as the auto.master file, e.g.
> > +.sp
> > +.RS +.2i
> > +.ta 1.0i
> > +.nf
> > +/foo    /etc/auto.foo
> > +/baz    yp:baz.map
> > +.fi
> > +.RE
> >  .SH "SEE ALSO"
> >  .BR automount (8),
> >  .BR autofs (5),
> > diff --git a/samples/auto.master b/samples/auto.master
> > index 9a9968a..0fc57f3 100644
> > --- a/samples/auto.master
> > +++ b/samples/auto.master
> > @@ -13,7 +13,11 @@
> >  /net   -hosts
> >  #
> >  # Include /etc/auto.master.d/*.autofs
> > -# The included files must conform to the format of this file.
> > +# To add an extra map using this mechanism you will need to add
> > +# two configuration items - one /etc/auto.master.d/extra.autofs file
> > +# (using the same line format as the auto.master file)
> > +# and a separate mount map (e.g. /etc/auto.extra or an auto.extra NIS map)
> > +# that is referred to by the foo.autofs file.
> 
> Shouldn't that be extra.autofs not foo.autofs?

yep, absolutely correct.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Ext4]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux