On 09/08/17 17:51, Ian Kent wrote: > On 09/08/17 16:39, David Howells wrote: >> Ian Kent <raven@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> In order to handle the AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT for both system calls the >>> negative dentry case in follow_automount() needs to be changed to >>> return ENOENT when the LOOKUP_AUTOMOUNT flag is clear (and the other >>> required flags are clear). >> >> Should the be EREMOTE instead of ENOENT? > > I thought about that and ended up thinking ENOENT was more sensible > but I'll look at it again. I think EREMOTE and ENOENT both are inaccurate. There's no way to know if the negative dentry corresponds to a valid map key, and we've seen increasing lookups from userspace applications for invalid directories, so I'm not sure. I went with ENOENT but I guess we could use EREMOTE, what's your thinking on why EREMOTE might be better than ENOENT? Ian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe autofs" in
