Ian Kent <raven@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, 2016-09-23 at 14:15 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> Ian Kent <raven@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> 2> On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 20:37 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> > > Ian Kent <raven@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> > > >> > > > On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 10:43 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> > > > > Ian Kent <raven@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> > > > > >> > > > > > Eric, Mateusz, I appreciate your spending time on this and >> > > > > > particularly >> > > > > > pointing >> > > > > > out my embarrassingly stupid is_local_mountpoint() usage mistake. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Please accept my apology for the inconvenience. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > If all goes well (in testing) I'll have follow up patches to correct >> > > > > > this >> > > > > > fairly >> > > > > > soon. >> > > > > >> > > > > Related question. Do you happen to know how many mounts per mount >> > > > > namespace tend to be used? It looks like it is going to be wise to >> > > > > put >> > > > > a configurable limit on that number. And I would like the default to >> > > > > be >> > > > > something high enough most people don't care. I believe autofs is >> > > > > likely where people tend to use the most mounts. >> > >> > Yes, I agree, I did want to try and avoid changing the parameters to >> > ->d_mamange() but passing a struct path pointer might be better in the long >> > run >> > anyway. >> >> Given that there is exactly one implementation of d_manage in the tree I >> don't imagine it will be disruptive to change that. > > Yes, but it could be used by external modules. > > And there's also have_submounts(). Good point about have_submounts. > I can update that using the existing d_walk() infrastructure or take it (mostly) > into the autofs module and get rid of have_submounts(). > > I'll go with the former to start with and see what people think. That will be interesting to so. It is not clear to me that if d_walk needs to be updated, and if d_walk doesn't need to be updated I would be surprised to see it take into autofs. But I am happy to look at the end result and see what you come up with. Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe autofs" in