On Wed, 2016-09-14 at 12:28 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Ian Kent <raven@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > If an automount mount is clone(2)ed into a file system that is
> > propagation private, when it later expires in the originating
> > namespace subsequent calls to autofs ->d_automount() for that
> > dentry in the original namespace will return ELOOP until the
> > mount is manually umounted in the cloned namespace.
> >
> > In the same way, if an autofs mount is triggered by automount(8)
> > running within a container the dentry will be seen as mounted in
> > the root init namespace and calls to ->d_automount() in that namespace
> > will return ELOOP until the mount is umounted within the container.
> >
> > Also, have_submounts() can return an incorect result when a mount
> > exists in a namespace other than the one being checked.
>
> Overall this appears to be a fairly reasonable set of changes. It does
> increase the expense when an actual mount point is encountered, but if
> these are the desired some increase in cost when a dentry is a
> mountpoint is unavoidable.
The possibility of a significant increase in overhead with this change for
autofs is one reason I've held back on posting the change for a long time.
If there are many instances of a mount (ie. thousands) I think the mnt_namespace
mount list could become large enough to be a problem. So that list might
eventually need to be a hashed list instead of a linear list.
But this would likely also be a problem in areas other than just autofs.
>
> May I ask the motiviation for this set of changes? Reading through the
> changes I don't grasp why we want to change the behavior of autofs.
> What problem is being solved? What are the benefits?
>
> Eric
>
> > Signed-off-by: Ian Kent <raven@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c | 2 +-
> > fs/autofs4/expire.c | 4 ++--
> > fs/autofs4/root.c | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
> > fs/autofs4/waitq.c | 2 +-
> > 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c b/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c
> > index c7fcc74..0024e25 100644
> > --- a/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c
> > +++ b/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c
> > @@ -564,7 +564,7 @@ static int autofs_dev_ioctl_ismountpoint(struct file
> > *fp,
> >
> > devid = new_encode_dev(dev);
> >
> > - err = have_submounts(path.dentry);
> > + err = have_local_submounts(path.dentry);
> >
> > if (follow_down_one(&path))
> > magic = path.dentry->d_sb->s_magic;
> > diff --git a/fs/autofs4/expire.c b/fs/autofs4/expire.c
> > index d8e6d42..7cc34ef 100644
> > --- a/fs/autofs4/expire.c
> > +++ b/fs/autofs4/expire.c
> > @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ static int autofs4_tree_busy(struct vfsmount *mnt,
> > * count for the autofs dentry.
> > * If the fs is busy update the expiry counter.
> > */
> > - if (d_mountpoint(p)) {
> > + if (is_local_mountpoint(p)) {
> > if (autofs4_mount_busy(mnt, p)) {
> > top_ino->last_used = jiffies;
> > dput(p);
> > @@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ static struct dentry *autofs4_check_leaves(struct
> > vfsmount *mnt,
> > while ((p = get_next_positive_dentry(p, parent))) {
> > pr_debug("dentry %p %pd\n", p, p);
> >
> > - if (d_mountpoint(p)) {
> > + if (is_local_mountpoint(p)) {
> > /* Can we umount this guy */
> > if (autofs4_mount_busy(mnt, p))
> > continue;
> > diff --git a/fs/autofs4/root.c b/fs/autofs4/root.c
> > index fa84bb8..4150ad6 100644
> > --- a/fs/autofs4/root.c
> > +++ b/fs/autofs4/root.c
> > @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ static int autofs4_dir_open(struct inode *inode, struct
> > file *file)
> > * it.
> > */
> > spin_lock(&sbi->lookup_lock);
> > - if (!d_mountpoint(dentry) && simple_empty(dentry)) {
> > + if (!is_local_mountpoint(dentry) && simple_empty(dentry)) {
> > spin_unlock(&sbi->lookup_lock);
> > return -ENOENT;
> > }
> > @@ -370,28 +370,28 @@ static struct vfsmount *autofs4_d_automount(struct
> > path *path)
> >
> > /*
> > * If the dentry is a symlink it's equivalent to a directory
> > - * having d_mountpoint() true, so there's no need to call back
> > - * to the daemon.
> > + * having is_local_mountpoint() true, so there's no need to
> > + * call back to the daemon.
> > */
> > if (d_really_is_positive(dentry) && d_is_symlink(dentry)) {
> > spin_unlock(&sbi->fs_lock);
> > goto done;
> > }
> >
> > - if (!d_mountpoint(dentry)) {
> > + if (!is_local_mountpoint(dentry)) {
> > /*
> > * It's possible that user space hasn't removed directories
> > * after umounting a rootless multi-mount, although it
> > - * should. For v5 have_submounts() is sufficient to handle
> > - * this because the leaves of the directory tree under the
> > - * mount never trigger mounts themselves (they have an
> > autofs
> > - * trigger mount mounted on them). But v4 pseudo direct
> > mounts
> > - * do need the leaves to trigger mounts. In this case we
> > - * have no choice but to use the list_empty() check and
> > - * require user space behave.
> > + * should. For v5 have_local_submounts() is sufficient to
> > + * handle this because the leaves of the directory tree
> > under
> > + * the mount never trigger mounts themselves (they have an
> > + * autofs trigger mount mounted on them). But v4 pseudo
> > + * direct mounts do need the leaves to trigger mounts. In
> > + * this case we have no choice but to use the list_empty()
> > + * check and require user space behave.
> > */
> > if (sbi->version > 4) {
> > - if (have_submounts(dentry)) {
> > + if (have_local_submounts(dentry)) {
> > spin_unlock(&sbi->fs_lock);
> > goto done;
> > }
> > @@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static int autofs4_d_manage(struct dentry *dentry, bool
> > rcu_walk)
> >
> > /* The daemon never waits. */
> > if (autofs4_oz_mode(sbi)) {
> > - if (!d_mountpoint(dentry))
> > + if (!is_local_mountpoint(dentry))
> > return -EISDIR;
> > return 0;
> > }
> > @@ -460,7 +460,7 @@ static int autofs4_d_manage(struct dentry *dentry, bool
> > rcu_walk)
> >
> > if (ino->flags & AUTOFS_INF_WANT_EXPIRE)
> > return 0;
> > - if (d_mountpoint(dentry))
> > + if (is_local_mountpoint(dentry))
> > return 0;
> > inode = d_inode_rcu(dentry);
> > if (inode && S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode))
> > @@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ static int autofs4_d_manage(struct dentry *dentry, bool
> > rcu_walk)
> > * we can avoid needless calls ->d_automount() and avoid
> > * an incorrect ELOOP error return.
> > */
> > - if ((!d_mountpoint(dentry) && !simple_empty(dentry)) ||
> > + if ((!is_local_mountpoint(dentry) && !simple_empty(dentry))
> > ||
> > (d_really_is_positive(dentry) && d_is_symlink(dentry)))
> > status = -EISDIR;
> > }
> > diff --git a/fs/autofs4/waitq.c b/fs/autofs4/waitq.c
> > index 431fd7e..911f4d5 100644
> > --- a/fs/autofs4/waitq.c
> > +++ b/fs/autofs4/waitq.c
> > @@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ static int validate_request(struct autofs_wait_queue
> > **wait,
> > dentry = new;
> > }
> > }
> > - if (have_submounts(dentry))
> > + if (have_local_submounts(dentry))
> > valid = 0;
> >
> > if (new)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe autofs" in
