Hello, On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 03:58:38PM +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > On Mon, 2016-05-02 at 18:08 +0200, Christof Koehler wrote: > > We are still using NIS and actually we had the autofs map in NIS > > for years. > > Actually I hadn't thought about NIS and IPv6 and I haven't seen any > discussion about it so it probably isn't ok with IPv6. Still, if you need any tests ... > > The autofs LDAP code is complicated, it's difficult to work with. > > Anyway, for my part, if you have a system that your site is comfortable > with that suits your needs, and you don't have a compelling reason to > move to LDAP, I'd recommend holding back from moving to it. I believe that, especially considering that there are three (?) different schemas for storing them. That's sufficient to convince me to not store our non-executable maps in LDAP (if I ever move to LDAP). I can manage them fine using ansible I believe. Best Regards Christof -- Dr. rer. nat. Christof Köhler email: c.koehler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Universitaet Bremen/ BCCMS phone: +49-(0)421-218-62334 Am Fallturm 1/ TAB/ Raum 3.12 fax: +49-(0)421-218-62770 28359 Bremen PGP: http://www.bccms.uni-bremen.de/cms/people/c_koehler/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe autofs" in
