On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 11:55 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 15:48 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 10:19:07 +1100 Stephen Rothwell < > > sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Hi Ian, > > > > > > On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 08:30:17 +0800 Ian Kent <raven@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > I haven't had anything significant enough for autofs to warrant > > > > maintaining a tree and sending push requests so I'll need to ask > > > > Stephen what I need to do (perhaps you could offer some advise on > > > > that > > > > now Stephen, please). > > > > > > I guess if its just a few patches every now and then, then Andrew > > > Morton may be the best person to shepherd them upstream. > > > > yup, send 'em along. > > > > I actually was handling the autofs4 stuff back in 2014 for a bit. > > Thanks Andrew. > > Last time I tried to send the module rename series we got confused some > how, patches not seen leading to conflicts in applying later patches > IIRC, which lead to the recommendation I send them to linux-next. > > The series has grown a bit too now but I'm thinking I should send them > in smaller groups, such as coding style fixes and white space fixes, > change to use pr* logging, etc. > > Hopefully that will make the process much more straight forward. > > The thing is the patches are mostly not urgent which is why I keep > postponing sending them when higher priority things come up. > > As for the patch from Stanislav, I'll put that at the top of my patch > queue, have a quick look at it and send it over so that, hopefully, it > can get merged. > > I'll probably send a couple of others too to get things going on with > (what I'm calling) the module rename series. Hi Andrew, I've sent the first bunch of patches to get this change started, including Stanislav's patch. Thanks Ian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe autofs" in
