Re: Mount point not auto unmounted after system date/time change

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 19:02 +0800, Ning Yu wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Ian Kent <raven@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 18:28 +0800, Ning Yu wrote:
> >> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Ian Kent <raven@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 16:45 +0800, Ning Yu wrote:
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >>
> >> >> I have composed a patch for this issue, it works in my side, what it
> >> >> does is replacing gettimeofday() with clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC).
> >> >>
> >> >> Would anyone please help to review it? Thanks in advance.
> >> >
> >> > Are you joking!
> >> > How is this meant to apply to the current source, it won't.
> >> >
> >> > If you can manage to post a sane patch you will need to break it up into
> >> > a few separate standalone patches with sane explanations of what each
> >> > one is meant to achieve.
> >>
> >> I'm sorry, not to offend, the previous patch was huge because all the call to
> >> time() or gettimeofday() functions are replaced with clock_gettime().
> >
> > Encountering this after a generally unpleasant day is bound to get a
> > short and unpleasant response, ;)
> >
> 
> Best wishes for you and have a nice day/night :)
> 
> >>
> >> Please allow me to re-send the patch, this time I have splitted it into
> >> several smaller patches, hope it won't be as stupid as previous one.
> >
> > Well, I see those posts but there are still problems with your email
> > program.
> >
> > Apart from the DOS line ends all the tabs appear to have been collapsed
> > to single spaces.
> >
> > I really don't want to go through and apply these hunk by hunk manually
> > when you must have a properly formatted patch already.
> >
> 
> Thanks for pointing it out, I will have to fix my email client issue first and
> resend the patches. Sorry for wasting you so much of time.

A couple of other small things.

Please make the title of the patch email the same as the tittle of the
patch. And if possible add a [PATCH x/y] prefix to the title, x being
the ordering of the patch within the y patches posted.

And in patch titles I commonly use "autofs-n-v-r - actual title".

So for example one of these would have a title like:
autofs-5.1.1 - Use monotonic clock instead of time()

assuming you had made them against the 5.1.1 source.

I've also started to use (quite recently in fact) "Signed-off-by:" in
patches so please add yours too, I don't feel right about adding it for
someone else as it's an assumption that may or may not be correct.

These things aren't a big deal as I can change most of them myself
easily if it's not convenient for you to do it.

> 
> >>
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> From cdb2bcd563420cd39af199309e8c0c7fc45a7bd1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >> >> From: Yu Ning <ning.yu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:56:21 +0800
> >> >> Subject: [PATCH] Use clock_gettime() instead of gettimeofday().
> >> >>
> >> >> This patch is to fix the issue that a mount point may not be
> >> >> automatically unmounted after a system date/time change.
> >> >>
> >> >> Reproducer with 100% failrate:
> >> >
> >> > Since of you to hammer the result of the problem you've identified
> >> > rather than just explain the problem and what needs to be done to
> >> > resolve it in a polite and sensible manner.
> >> >
> >
> >


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe autofs" in



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Ext4]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux