On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 11:24:58 +0800 Ian Kent <raven@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 09:41 +1000, NeilBrown wrote: > > autofs4 currently doesn't support RCU-walk - it immediately > > aborts any attempt at RCU-walk to force REF-walk for path name > > lookup. > > As discussed I don't have time to properly test these just now but I'll > do my best to review the patches and return to test them later. Thanks. > > My impression is that you will be submitting these patches rather than > expecting me to pick them up and submit them. If that's not what your > expecting please let me know. I had assumed that you would take them as you are listed as the maintainer. However if you would like me to send them on I can certainly do that. You seem to send via Andrew Morton so I'll do that when they seem to be ready if you like. > > I appreciate you including me in this work, all to often things get > merged that I'm miss and while I may not have identified any problem > with them at the time at least I would be aware of what I might need to > look at when problems arise. > Maybe I'm old fashioned, but I have this idea that all patches *must* at least be Cc:ed to the maintainer and if they are as intrusive as these, they *must* be approved. Maybe others behave different? Thanks, NeilBrown
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
