On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 13:06 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 20:49:39 +0800 Ian Kent <raven@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On strict build environments we can see: > > > > fs/autofs4/inode.c: In function 'autofs4_fill_super': > > fs/autofs4/inode.c:312: error: 'pgrp' may be used uninitialized in this > > function > > make[2]: *** [fs/autofs4/inode.o] Error 1 > > make[1]: *** [fs/autofs4] Error 2 > > make: *** [fs] Error 2 > > make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > > > > This is due to the use of pgrp_set being used to indicate pgrp has > > has been set rather than initializing pgrp itself. > > > > Yes, that code seems to be explicitly designed to trigger a gcc warning ;) > > What is a "strict build environment"? Someone's using -Werror for the > entire kernel? That must make for a miserable life. Yes, TBH I was a bit surprised myself. It resulted from a RHEL-6.6 patch submission. I didn't notice it and ended up missing an internal (RedHat) patch submission deadline as my original interest in these was the result of an upstream discussion and I stupidly relied on my upstream testing. It might just be that our internal up and coming file system tree is specifically more fussy but never the less I got caught out. Ian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe autofs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
